Commonwealth v. Rosario
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
SPAETH, Judge:
This is an appeal from a judgment of sentence for possession of a controlled substance and possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance. Appellant argues that he is entitled to a new trial because the search warrant under which the controlled substance in question was seized was invalid. We agree, and therefore reverse and remand for a new trial.
On October 15, 1979, a warrant was obtained to search appellant’s residence. The affidavit in support of the request for the warrant alleged:
1. That during the past month (Oct. 5, 1979) we received a complaint that Carmelo…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Commonwealth v. BonasorteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Commonwealth v. KlimkowiczSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Commonwealth v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Commonwealth v. YergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- Commonwealth v. O'SheaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.