Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Rosario

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided October 14, 1983No. 1301PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SPAETH, Judge:

This is an appeal from a judgment of sentence for possession of a controlled substance and possession with intent to deliver a controlled substance. Appellant argues that he is entitled to a new trial because the search warrant under which the controlled substance in question was seized was invalid. We agree, and therefore reverse and remand for a new trial.

On October 15, 1979, a warrant was obtained to search appellant’s residence. The affidavit in support of the request for the warrant alleged:

1. That during the past month (Oct. 5, 1979) we received a complaint that Carmelo…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Aguilar v. TexasSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  3. Spinelli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. United States v. MendenhallSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Jones v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. BonasorteSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  2. Commonwealth v. KlimkowiczSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. Commonwealth v. MillerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Commonwealth v. YergerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  5. Commonwealth v. O'SheaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API