Legal Opinion
Kilbourn v. Candy Ford-Mercury, Inc.
District Court, W.D. Michigan
Decided March 11, 2002No. Case No. 1:01-CV-142PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
QUIST, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Jamie Kilbourn (“Kilbourn”), filed this proposed class action against Defendant, Candy Ford-Mercury (“Candy Ford”), a car dealership from which she purchased an automobile on credit. Kilbourn claims that Candy Ford violated numerous provisions within the Truth in Lending Act (“TILA” or the “Act”), 15 U.S.C. §§ 1601-1667Í, the Michigan Pricing and Advertising Act (“MPAA”), M.C.L. §§ 445.351-.364, the Michigan Consumer Protection Act (“MCPA”), M.C.L. §§ 445.901-.922, the Michigan Motor Vehicle Installment Sales Contracts Act (“MVISC”), M.C.L. §§…
2Cases cited23 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- In Re American Medical Systems, Inc. Pfizer, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Ronald A. Landefeld v. Marion General Hospital, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1993
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Diaz v. Paragon Motors of Woodside, Inc.District Court, E.D. New York · 2006
- Brown v. SCI Funeral Services of Florida, Inc.District Court, S.D. Florida · 2003
- Baker v. Sunny Chevrolet, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Hook v. BakerDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2004
- McDonald v. Checks-N-Advance, Inc. (In Re Ferrell)United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.