Legal Opinion

James A. Moore v. United States

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided October 24, 1957No. 13739, 13740PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

These are appeals from a denial of a motion to vacate sentences under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (1952). We find no error affecting substantial rights. The allegations in the petition, even taking them to be true, would not justify the relief requested; in such a case, denial without a hearing is proper. See Adams v. United States, 1955, 95 U.S.App.D.C. 354, 222 F.2d 45; White v. United States, 1956, 98 U.S.App.D.C. 274, 235 F.2d 221; Morris v. United States, 1957, 101 U.S.App.D.C. 296, 248 F.2d 618. Appellant relies on Bailey v. United States, 1957, 101 U.S.App.D.C. 236, 248 F.2d 558; and Jenkins v.…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. James E. Adams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955
  2. Mason W. White v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
  3. Alexander Morris v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
  4. Eugene Bailey v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
  5. Carroll M. Jenkins v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Arthur Bruce v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
  2. Alphonzo Edwards v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
  3. John Allen Kendrick v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
  4. Alphonzo Edwards v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1958
  5. Arthur Bruce v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API