Legal Opinion

John Allen Kendrick v. United States

Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit

Decided February 27, 1958No. 14149PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

In 1956 appellant was convicted and sentenced for assault with a deadly weapon. The conviction was affirmed on direct appeal, Kendrick v. United States, 99 U.S.App.D.C. 173, 238 F.2d 34 (1956). On motion to vacate sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, filed a year after the sentence, appellant raises for the first time the claim that he was denied the right to accompany the jury to view the premises where the crime took place. The District Court denied the motion after a hearing.

Whatever may be the nature of the right of an accused to be personally present during a view, 1 the record discloses…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Snyder v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
  2. James E. Adams v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1955
  3. John Allen Kendrick v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1956
  4. Grant T. Martin v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
  5. James A. Moore v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Fred Stein v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
  2. James G. Burley v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API