Legal Opinion
Radovich v. Agricultural Labor Relations Board
California Court of Appeal
Decided July 27, 1977No. Docket Nos. 3073, 3087PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HOPPER, J.
These matters are consolidated appeals from judgments of the Superior Court of Tulare County. In each case after a hearing on a petition for administrative mandamus, the court found that the Agricultural Labor Relations Board did not act in excess of its jurisdiction; the jurisdiction of the regularity of elections was part of the function and jurisdiction reserved to the Agricultural Labor Relations Board and the superior court was without jurisdiction.1
Appellants contend: (1) That the superior court has jurisdiction under Code of Civil Procedure section 1094.5 to review the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Leedom v. KyneSupreme Court of the United States · 1958
- Boire v. Greyhound Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Harold A. Boire, Regional Director, Twelfth Region, National Labor Relations Board v. The Miami Herald Publishing CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1965
- English v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- Frank W. McCulloch Etc. v. Libbey-Owens-Ford Glass Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- J. R. Norton Co. v. Agricultural Labor Relations BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Edwards v. SteeleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- George Arakelian Farms, Inc. v. Agricultural Labor Relations BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
- Cadiz v. Agricultural Labor Relations BoardCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1979
- Woods v. Department of Motor VehiclesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1989
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.