Legal Opinion

Savastano v. Nurnberg

New York Supreme Court

Decided September 16, 1987PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Cosmo Di Tucci, J.

This is an action for a judgment declaring that section 29.11 of the Mental Hygiene Law and 14 NYCRR 517.4, which permit the transfer of involuntarily committed mentally ill *594patients from an acute-care facility to a long-term facility, over objection, and without a prior judicial hearing as to the need for such transfer, are violative of mentally ill patients’ right to due process of law under the New York State and United States Constitutions. Plaintiffs further move for a permanent injunction prohibiting defendants from transferring any objecting…

2Cases cited27 opinions

  1. Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Fuentes v. ShevinSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  3. Meachum v. FanoSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Vitek v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. Hearst Corp. v. ClyneNew York Court of Appeals · 1980

22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Savastano v. NurnbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API