Legal Opinion

Sekiya v. Anderson

District Court, D. New Mexico

Decided July 31, 2020No. 1:19-cv-00146Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO MIKKO SEKIYA, Plaintiff, vs. No. CIV 19-0146 JB\JHR JOHN ANDERSON, TIMOTHY TREMBLEY, and the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, filed February 21, 2019 (Doc. 1)(“Complaint”). Plaintiff Mikko Sekiya is pro se and proceeding in forma pauperis. He alleges that a doctor implanted a wiretap device in his nasal passage, and that federal prosecutors used the wiretap to gain information. See Complaint…

2Cases cited47 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982

42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API