Sekiya v. Anderson
District Court, D. New Mexico
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEW MEXICO MIKKO SEKIYA, Plaintiff, vs. No. CIV 19-0146 JB\JHR JOHN ANDERSON, TIMOTHY TREMBLEY, and the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Prisoner Civil Rights Complaint Pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, filed February 21, 2019 (Doc. 1)(“Complaint”). Plaintiff Mikko Sekiya is pro se and proceeding in forma pauperis. He alleges that a doctor implanted a wiretap device in his nasal passage, and that federal prosecutors used the wiretap to gain information. See Complaint…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.