Legal Opinion
Brindell-Bruno, Inc. v. Farnsworth & Chambers Co.
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided June 4, 1963No. 1062PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HALL, Judge.
This is a suit by a sub-contractor against the general contractor and the owner for a balance amounting to $2,404.72 alleged to be due for additional work performed and additional material furnished by the sub-contractor at the request of the defendants. From a judgment rejecting its demand plaintiff appealed.
The case stems from the refusal of the defendant contractor, Farnsworth & Chambers Co., Inc., to pay plaintiff its cost of replacing a certain pump which the architects and engineers on the project required to be replaced as not conforming to specifications. Plaintiff…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Berger v. QuinteroSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1930
- Davis-Wood Lumber Co. v. Farnsworth & Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1937
- Meyers v. Acme Homestead Ass'nLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1931
- Thompson v. StacyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1963
- Mall Tool Co. v. PoulanLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1949
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Charles X. Miller, Inc. v. Oak Builders, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1975
- Linda Mercantile Corporation v. BowersLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1970
- Braudaway v. United Equitable Insurance CompanyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1968
- Chemical Cleaning, Inc. v. Brindell-Bruno, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1966
- Harper v. Metairie Country ClubSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1971
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.