People v. Lamboy
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
The verdict was based on legally sufficient evidence and was not against the weight of the evidence. In response to the undercover officer’s request for "Q45” brand of heroin, defendant stated "No, Undercover”, clearly promoting the sale of a different brand of heroin. After the officer told him "one”, defendant asked the officer to wait and disappeared into a bodega. Defendant reappeared soon after with the codefendant, who conducted the actual exchange of the "Undercover” brand of heroin for prerecorded buy money, as defendant stood close by. Under the totality of the circumstances,…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. TevahaNew York Court of Appeals · 1994
- People v. PressleyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
- People v. TevahaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- People v. DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- People v. FonsecaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- People v. SingletonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- People v. HuntAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- People v. MarshallAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- People v. PinkstonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2019