Legal Opinion
Commonwealth v. Rosen
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
Decided April 25, 2012No. 50 MAP 2010Published
1Opinion of the Court
42 A.3d 988 (2012)
COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee,
v.
Adam ROSEN, Appellant.
No. 50 MAP 2010
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania.
Argued May 10, 2011.
Decided April 25, 2012.
Jules Epstein, Kairys, Rudovsky, Messing & Feinberg, Philadelphia, for Adam Rosen.
Robert Martin Falin, Risa Vetri Ferman, Norristown, Adrienne D. Jappe, Montgomery County District Attorney's Office, for Commonwealth of Pennsylvania.
BEFORE: CASTILLE, C.J., SAYLOR, EAKIN, BAER, TODD, McCAFFERY, ORIE MELVIN JJ.
OPINION
ORIE MELVIN, Justice.
We granted allowance of appeal to consider whether the Commonwealth can use evidence obtained…
Also in this document: Dissent.
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Estelle v. SmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Minnesota v. MurphySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Buchanan v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1987
- New Jersey v. PortashSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.