Legal Opinion
Jeremy Andrew Hules and Stephanie Lynn Hules v. State of California, et al.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided January 27, 2026No. 2:25-cv-10591Unknown
1Opinion
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 11 JEREMY ANDREW HULES and NO. CV 25-10591-FMO (AGR) 12 STEPHANIE LYNN HULES, 13 Plaintiffs, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE COURT SHOULD NOT 14 v. RECOMMEND DISMISSAL OF 15 COMPLAINT WITHOUT LEAVE TO STATE OF CALIFORNIA, et al., AMEND 16 Defendants. 17 18 I. 19 PROCEDURAL HISTORY 20 21 Plaintiffs Jeremy Andrew Hules and Stephanie Lynn Hules filed a complaint 22 on November 4, 2025 and paid the filing fee. (Dkt. No. 1.) The complaint names 23 two categories of defendants: (1) the County of Ventura,…
2Cases cited50 opinions
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Erickson v. PardusSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- Michael Lacey v. Joseph ArpaioCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2012
- Village of Willowbrook v. OlechSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.