People v. Forbes
California Supreme Court
Application for habeas corpus. The facts appear in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtNorton, J.
The defendant is held in custody by virtue of five separate sentences passed upon him on the sixth day of September, 1862, by the Recorder’s Court of the City and County of San Francisco. One adjudges that he be imprisoned for the period of ninety days. Each of the others adjudges that he be imprisoned for the period of ninety days, “ said term to commence at the expiration of previous sentences.” Having been imprisoned more than ninety days, he claims now to be discharged, upon the ground that the sentences to commence at the expiration of previous sentences are void, for not fixing any…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. SmithSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1811
- Brown v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1833
- Russell v. CommonwealthSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1822
3Cited by10 opinions
- In Re ShulerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1930
- In re BloomMichigan Supreme Court · 1884
- In Re PedriniCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
- Prince v. StateTexas Supreme Court · 1876
- Ex Parte BellCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1926
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.