Legal Opinion

Diggs Realty & Insurance v. Pertile

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided January 4, 1977No. 2 CA-CIV 2071PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

HATHAWAY, Judge.

This is an appeal from the superior court’s refusal to permit a trial de novo of an arbitration award. The trial de novo was requested pursuant to Rule 7(c) of the Uniform Rules of Procedure for Arbitration, A.R.S. Vol. 17A.

The dispute, a disagreement between real estate agents regarding entitlement to a commission, was originally heard by an arbitrator under the provisions of the Uniform Rules of Procedure for Arbitration. An award was filed with the superior court in favor of the plaintiff-appellee on July 18, 1975, and the defendants moved for a new trial on July 28.…

2Cited by7 opinions

  1. Decola v. FreyerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  2. Phillips v. GarciaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
  3. Suppeland v. NilzCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
  4. Varga v. HebernCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
  5. Decola v. FreyerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API