Diggs Realty & Insurance v. Pertile
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HATHAWAY, Judge.
This is an appeal from the superior court’s refusal to permit a trial de novo of an arbitration award. The trial de novo was requested pursuant to Rule 7(c) of the Uniform Rules of Procedure for Arbitration, A.R.S. Vol. 17A.
The dispute, a disagreement between real estate agents regarding entitlement to a commission, was originally heard by an arbitrator under the provisions of the Uniform Rules of Procedure for Arbitration. An award was filed with the superior court in favor of the plaintiff-appellee on July 18, 1975, and the defendants moved for a new trial on July 28.…
2Cited by7 opinions
- Decola v. FreyerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
- Phillips v. GarciaCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2015
- Suppeland v. NilzCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1980
- Varga v. HebernCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
- Decola v. FreyerCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.