Legal Opinion
Suppeland v. Nilz
Court of Appeals of Arizona
Decided December 3, 1980No. 2 CA-CIV 3604PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
HATHAWAY, Chief Judge.
This appeal presents the question of whether dismissal of an action without prejudice pursuant to 17A A.R.S., Super.Ct. Uniform Prac.Rules, rule V(d), for lack of prosecution, revives an earlier arbitration award as the final judgment in the case.
The plaintiff instituted suit which was set for compulsory arbitration. After an award for the plaintiff, defendant appealed to the superior court pursuant to A.R.S. Sec. 12-133. Trial was continued for various reasons, and after defendant moved for another continuance because a conflict of interest required his counsel…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Department of Revenue v. Southern Union Gas Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1978
- Walker v. KendigArizona Supreme Court · 1971
- Lee v. Cel-Pek Industries, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
- Barrentine v. Vulcan Materials CompanyDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1968
- Vazzano v. Superior CourtArizona Supreme Court · 1952
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- King v. LujanNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1982
- Burch v. Illinois Central RailroadMississippi Supreme Court · 2014
- Ashby v. BiglowCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2017
- James Allen Burch v. Illinois Central Railroad CompanyMississippi Supreme Court · 2013