Legal Opinion
Henry v. Confederated Tribes of Grand Ronde
Grand Ronde Court of Appeals
Decided June 30, 2004No. A-03-05-001Published
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
MILLER, Chief Justice.
Appellants Candi Henry and Kathleen Tom appeal trial court orders denying their motion to recuse the trial judge and dismissing their complaint without leave to amend. We exercise jurisdiction pursuant to Tribal Code § 310(h)(2) and affirm.
I. FACTS
Candi Henry and Kathleen Tom were involuntarily terminated by their supervi*71sors from tribal employment on December 14, 2001, and March 29, 2002, respectively. Supplemental Excerpts of Record (“SER”) 13 & 14. Neither appellant utilized the employment grievance process provided by the tribal employee handbook. SER 12.…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- John Doe v. United States of America, in Re John Doe, Debtor. John Doe v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
- Grove Fresh Distributors, Inc. v. John Labatt, Ltd. And American Citrus Products Corp., Appeal Of: John P. MessinaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2002
- Stevenson v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 2001
- Synowski v. Confederated Tribes of Grand RondeGrand Ronde Court of Appeals · 2003
- Miller v. Champion Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.