Legal Opinion
Finkelstein v. Central Mutual Insurance
City of New York Municipal Court
Decided September 12, 1957PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Max J. Wolff, Eef.
The case was tried before me by consent without a jury. Findings were waived.
This is an action upon a comprehensive all-risk insurance policy. The plaintiff is the owner of a nine-room one-family dwelling. The policy provided coverage with exclusions as follows:
“All risks of physical loss'to the property insured except as excluded:
“ Coverage C — Personal Property: Coverage C applies to all personal property owned, worn or used by the named Insured and members of the named Insured’s family of the same household, while in all situations anywhere in the world.
“ Exclusions Under…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Rex Roofing Co. v. Lumber Mutual Casualty InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1952
- Gervant v. New England Fire InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1954
- Mellon v. Federal Ins. Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1926
- Cross v. Zurich General Accident & Liability Ins. Co., LimitedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1950
- Kraftsow v. BrownSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1953
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Standard Structural Steel Co. v. Bethlehem Steel Corp.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1984
- Avis v. Hartford Fire Insurance CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1973
- City of Amsterdam v. Daniel Goldreyer, Ltd.District Court, E.D. New York · 1995
- Egan v. Washington General Insurance CorporationDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1970
- David Danzeisen Realty Corp. v. Continental InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.