Legal Opinion

Williams v. Atkinson

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 14, 1919No. 1546PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from Dallam County Court; J. E. Moore, Judge. Action by George F. Atkinson against Carl Williams. Judgment for plaintiff, and defendant brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtHall, J.

Defendant in error, Atkinson, a real estate broker, sued Carl Williams, to recover commissions alleged to be due him for services rendered plaintiff in error in the sale of certain lands belonging to the latter, which it was alleged were sold to one Randolph. The petition alleges that the land described therein and certain personal property was listed with him by defendant for sale upon certain terms, with instructions to find a purchaser upon such terms; the plaintiff then and there agreeing to pay him a commission of 5 per cent, on the gross amount of the sale price. It is further alleged…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Brackenridge v. Claridge & PayneTexas Supreme Court · 1898
  2. Henderson Grant v. GilbertCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1914
  3. Loomis v. Broaddus & LeavellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911
  4. Pierce v. NicholsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1908
  5. Levy v. Dunken Realty Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1915

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Keener v. ClevelandTexas Commission of Appeals · 1923
  2. Joseph v. BostickTexas Commission of Appeals · 1925
  3. Waurika Oil Ass'n No. I v. EllisCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1921
  4. Curlee v. PhelpsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1922

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API