Legal Opinion

General Motors Corp. v. Jernigan

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided December 12, 2003No. 1020069PublishedCited by 39 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.]

General Motors Corporation ("GM") appeals from a judgment entered on a jury verdict in favor of Wilbert Jernigan, individually and as father and next friend of Jeffrey Jernigan, a minor child (the father is hereinafter referred to as "Jernigan"), and from the trial court's order denying its postjudgment motion. We affirm in part,…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  2. Batson v. KentuckySupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Kumho Tire Co. v. CarmichaelSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
  4. Frye v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1923
  5. Swain v. AlabamaSupreme Court of the United States · 1965

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by39 opinions

  1. Vesta Fire Ins. Corp. v. Milam & Co. Constr., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2004
  2. Branham v. Ford Motor Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 2010
  3. Doster v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2010
  4. Sharifi v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2008
  5. Barber v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Alabama · 2005

34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API