Legal Opinion

South Texas Lumber Co. v. Concrete Const. Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided June 15, 1911PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Harris County; W. P. Hamblen, Judge. Action by the Concrete Construction Company and others against the South Texas Lumber Company and others. Judgment for plaintiffs, and defendant lumber company and B. W. Armstrong appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtReese, J.

In this suit the Concrete Construction Company and B. ■E. Secor sued B. W. Armstrong and the South Texas Lumber Company, and A. J. Grady individually and as surviving partner of the firm of Van De-mark & Grady; the construction company to recover $435.64, and B. P. Secor to recov er $225. Barthold & Oasey came in as in-tervener ; plaintiffs seeking to recover against the same parties $229. Upon trial with a jury, a verdict was returned in favor of the Concrete Construction Company against Armstrong for $435.64, and in favor of Barthold & Casey and B. F. Secor against the South Texas Lumber…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Citizens National Bank of Orlando and West Construction Company v. K. H. VittCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
  2. Olshan Lumber Company v. BullardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  3. Gordon-Jones Const. Co. v. WelderCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1918
  4. East Texas Bank & Trust Co. v. Mid-South Contractors, Inc.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1970
  5. Carr & Howard Construction Co. v. Panhandle State BankCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API