Legal Opinion

Carr & Howard Construction Co. v. Panhandle State Bank

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided May 29, 1961No. 7058PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DENTON, Chief Justice.

The appellee, Panhandle State Bank of Borger, instituted this suit against Carr & Howard Construction Company and Orvil Thornburg, Jr., for the sum of $2,000, the alleged unpaid balance due on a promissory note. The note, in the original amount of $5,000, was executed by Thornburg in favor of the appellee bank. The alleged cause of action against Carr & Howard was based on an assignment by Thornburg to the bank and the acceptance of the assignment by Carr & Howard. The case was tried to a jury, but upon the close of the evidence both parties filed motions for instructed…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Goggin v. State Nat. Bank of El PasoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  2. Cooper v. CockeCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  3. Hardin Lumber Co. v. ShepherdCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1931
  4. South Texas Lumber Co. v. Concrete Const. Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1911

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Matter of Estate of BoydWyoming Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Citizens National Bank of Orlando and West Construction Company v. K. H. VittCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1966
  3. Olshan Lumber Company v. BullardCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1965
  4. First National Bank of Minot v. MacDonald Construction Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1965
  5. Reading & Bates v. BAKER ENERGY RESOURCESLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1997

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API