Legal Opinion
Guaranty Trust Co. v. Seaboard Air Line Ry. Co.
District Court, E.D. Virginia
Decided September 18, 1935No. 214PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WAY, District Judge.
Upon' considering the master’s report and the evidence returned therewith, I am of the opinion that all the exceptions thereto should be overruled and the report approved and confirmed.
References are made in the stipulation of facts and the argument to the action of the railway in charging certain items to capital account, which the master has found were really operating expenses and entitled to priority if furnished within the six months immediately preceding the appointment of receivers. In that connection, see Continental Trust Co. v. Bonsal & Co. (C.C.A.) 72 F.(2d)…
2Cases cited47 opinions
- Fosdick v. SchallSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- United States Trust Co. v. Wabash Western Railway Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Quincy, Missouri & Pacific Railroad v. HumphreysSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- New York Dock Co. v. Steamship PoznanSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Sparhawk v. YerkesSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
42 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Johnson Fare Box Co. v. DoyleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958
- Pullman Co. v. Chicago & N. W. R. Co.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1940
- Continental Casualty Co. v. PowellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1936
- Johnson Fare Box Company v. DoyleCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1958