Legal Opinion
Pullman Co. v. Chicago & N. W. R. Co.
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided February 24, 1940No. 7045PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KERNER, Circuit Judge.
This appeal is taken from an order of the District Court in a railroad reorganization case, which disposed of claims filed by appellant for services rendered. The Court allowed one claim, disallowed another, granted a set-off, and classified the claims *427as general and not entitled to priority. The appeal presents a problem going to the validity of the set-off and to the validity and nature of the claims in question, which in turn depend upon the character of the contract relation between the creditor and the debtor.
On June 28, 1935 the Chicago and North Western Railway,…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Fosdick v. SchallSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
- Kneeland v. American Loan & Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1890
- Thomas v. Western Car Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Chicago, St. Louis & New Orleans Railroad v. Pullman Southern Car Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1891
- Southern Railway Co. v. Carnegie Steel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1900
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- California Apparel Creators v. Wieder of California, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
- Marion B. Folsom, Secretary of the Department of Health, Education and Welfare v. Gretta N. PearsallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1957
- In Re Tennessee Central Railway CompanyDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1970
- The Home Insurance Company v. Thomas H. Riddell, Jr., and Charles F. RiddellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1958
- In re Chicago, Milwaukee, St. Paul & Pacific RailroadCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.