Legal Opinion
Wiese v. Astrue
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided January 16, 2009No. 08-1186PublishedCited by 122 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BEAM, Circuit Judge.
Christina Wiese appeals from the district court’s 1 order affirming the Commissioner’s denial of supplemental security income. We affirm.
I. BACKGROUND
At the time of the 2006 hearing before the Administrative Law Judge (ALJ), Wiese was twenty-five years old and unemployed. The last time she worked was in 2003, and even then only for two months. Although she had originally filed for benefits under Title II and Title XVI, only her application for supplemental security income remained unresolved.
Wiese filed for disability in 2001 on the basis of her polycystic ovarian…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Lorraine POLASKI, Et Al., Appellees, v. Margaret M. HECKLER, Secretary of Health and Human Services, AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1984
- Bertha Eichelberger v. Jo Anne B. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004
- Larry Krogmeier v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, 1 Commissioner of Social Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2002
- Finch v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
- Frank O. MAPES, Appellant, v. Shirley S. CHATER, Commissioner of the Social Security Administration, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by122 opinions
- McCoy v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
- Charles Miller v. Carolyn W. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2015
- Renstrom v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2012
- Angela Myers v. Carolyn W. ColvinCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2013
- Johnson v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
117 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.