Legal Opinion

Justice v. Meeker

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided March 12, 1906No. Appeal, No. 10PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal, No. 10, Oct. T., 1905, by defendant, from order of C. P. Lehigh Co., Nov. T., 1895, No. 117, permitting amendment and refusing to strike off a judgment in case of William Justice & Sons v. Daniel Meeker & Co. Rule to amend transcript. Rule to strike off judgment. Before Trexler, P. J. The facts are stated in the opinion of the Superior Court. Error assigned was the order of the court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Porter, J.,

The plaintiffs brought an action against the defendant before a justice of the peace and judgment was entered in their favor on May 17, 1894; a transcript of this judgment was filed and judgment entered in the court of common pleas on November 19, 1895; on April 6, 1904, a scire, facias was issued to revive the judgment in the common pleas; the defendant, on June 16,1904, presented a petition and obtained a rule to show *209cause why the judgment should not be stricken from the record, because of irregularities in the proceedings before the justice disclosed by the…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Davis v. Davis, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Montour County1889
  2. McDonald v. SimcoxSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1881
  3. Caldwell v. ThompsonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1829
  4. Duffy v. OgdenSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1870
  5. Cromelien v. BrinkSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1858

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Samango v. HobbsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1950
  2. Eastman Kodak Co. v. OseniderSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1937
  3. Ryan v. BruhinSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1925
  4. Hendrix v. KelleySuperior Court of Delaware · 1928
  5. Shelansky v. A. Weinfeld & SonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1923

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API