Legal Opinion
Super Tire Engineering Co. v. McCorkle
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided February 25, 1977No. 76-1869PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
ALDISERT, Circuit Judge.
This appeal raises two parallel issues: whether New Jersey regulations1 which permit welfare payments to workers on strike are inconsistent with and, therefore, precluded by federal labor policy; and whether those same regulations are inconsistent with and precluded by federal welfare policy. The district court concluded that New Jersey’s regulations were not contrary to either federal policy and granted the defendants’ motion for summary judgment. Believing that the labor policy issue is foreclosed by Kimbell, Inc. v. Employment Security…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Hicks v. MirandaSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Street v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1969
- Super Tire Engineering Co. v. McCorkleSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Murdock v. City of MemphisSupreme Court of the United States · 1875
- Lawrence v. State Tax Comm'n of Miss.Supreme Court of the United States · 1932
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- New York Telephone Co. v. New York State Department of LaborSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Evans v. BuchananCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
- Unemployment Compensation Board of Review v. Sun Oil Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
- MEMCO v. Maryland Employment Security AdministrationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1977
- Peter J. Brennan, Secretary of Labor, United States Department of Labor, in No. 76-2014 v. Western Union Telegraph Co., in No. 76-2015Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.