Legal Opinion

Balent v. City of Wilkes-Barre

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided December 29, 1994No. 2322 C.D. 1993PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

KELTON, Senior Judge.

The City of Wilkes-Barre (City) appeals from the June 9, 1993 judgment of the Court of Common Pleas of Luzerne County (trial court) which denied the City’s motion for post-trial relief and affirmed a jury verdict of $30,000 in favor of Joseph J. Balent and George Barto (Owners). Claiming that the City had razed the Owners’ fire-damaged building without giving the Owners prior notice, the Owners had sought damages under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Section 1983)1 for an alleged violation of their right to procedural due process under the 5th and 14th Amendments of the United States…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Monell v. New York City Dept. of Social Servs.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. City of St. Louis v. PraprotnikSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Jett v. Dallas Independent School DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Henry J. Bennett, Jr. v. City of Slidell, Gerry Hinton, B.E. McDaniel Nunzio Giordano, and Patrick J. BerriganCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1984
  5. Delores Simmons, Administratrix of the Estate of Daniel La Friscoe Simmons v. The City of Philadelphia Police Officer A. Panati, Badge No. 2587Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Balent v. City of Wilkes-BarreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  2. Salameh v. SposseyCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1999
  3. Burkholz v. Commonwealth, Department of TransportationCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  4. Davis v. City of PhiladelphiaCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994
  5. Logue v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API