Gwaltney v. Keaton
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
1Opinion of the Court
ARNOLD, Judge.
Defendant Keaton’s Appeal
In response to a question concerning a blood alcohol test administered to defendant Triplett following the accident, Triplett testified that the results of the test were “.02.” It is correctly contended by defendant Keaton that an appropriate foundation was not laid in order to properly admit this testimony into evidence. State v. Powell, 279 N.C. 608, 184 S.E. 2d 243 (1971) ; State v. Caviness, 7 N.C. App. 541, 173 S.E. 2d 12 (1970). However, we fail to see any prejudice to defendant Keaton by the admission of the results of the blood alcohol test since…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Watters Ex Rel. Watters v. ParrishSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1960
- Norfleet v. HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
- State v. PowellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Norfleet v. . HallSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
- State v. CavinessCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1970
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Blow v. ShaughnessyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1988
- Sullivan v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1982
- Southern Railway Co. v. Jeffco Fibres, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 1979
- Scallon v. HooperCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1980
- Watson v. StorieCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1984