Legal Opinion

Vilar v. Rutledge

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 14, 2013PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Orders, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles E. Ramos, J.), entered March 14, 2012 and March 20, 2012, which, inter alia, respectively, granted the individual defendants’ motion and defendant Munder Capital Management, Inc.’s (Munder) motion to dismiss the complaint, unanimously affirmed, with costs.

Plaintiffs’ argument that they were entitled to payment when the independent directors/defendants entered into a management agreement with a new investment advisor following the arrests of the individual plaintiffs is unavailing, as plaintiffs had no right to continue managing the Amerindo…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Lama Holding Co. v. Smith Barney Inc.New York Court of Appeals · 1996
  2. Brown v. LockwoodAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  3. Goldman v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 2005
  4. Blondell v. LittlepageCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2010
  5. Stanfield Offshore Leveraged Assets, Ltd. v. Metropolitan Life InsuranceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Honua Fifth Avenue LLC v. 400 Fifth Realty LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  2. Honua Fifth Avenue LLC v. 400 Fifth Realty LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API