Legal Opinion

State v. Jones

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 12, 1991No. 264A89PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WEBB, Justice.

The defendant’s first assignment of error deals with what he contends is hearsay testimony which was erroneously allowed under the guise of corroborating the testimony of a witness. On direct examination Robert Sanders testified as to his telephone conversation with the defendant in part as follows:

Q. What happened after that? What was said after he said, this is me, Jimmy?

A. He told me that he had just shot Gail and to get the police.

Q. What else did he say to you before you gave them the phone?

A. Well, I had asked him where was Carol and Ashley were they there and he said, no,…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. State v. FisherSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986
  3. State v. BillupsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1981
  4. State v. PerrySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  5. State v. BurtonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. AbrahamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  2. State v. WaltersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2003
  3. State v. BowmanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2019
  4. State v. RileyCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2010
  5. State v. StittCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2001

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API