Legal Opinion

State v. Riley

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided February 2, 2010No. COA09-643PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

STEELMAN, Judge.

While the prosecutor improperly cross-examined defendant about pleading guilty to a lesser charge as part of a plea bargain, defendant failed to show that any error was prejudicial. While a portion of the prosecutor’s closing argument was improper, it did not rise to the level of denying defendant a fair trial. Pursuant to N.C. Gen. Stat. § 15A-1351, the maximum period of special probation that could have been imposed was one-fourth of defendant’s maximum sentence. When the trial court makes no findings in support of its imposition of a term of probation that exceeds the…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Darden v. WainwrightSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. State v. McCollumSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1993
  3. State v. JonesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 2002
  4. State v. AbrahamSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1994
  5. State v. WilliamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1986

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. State v. RileySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2010
  2. State v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2013
  3. State v. MorrisCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2015
  4. State v. RileySupreme Court of North Carolina · 2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API