Legal Opinion

Fontenot v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided June 8, 1994No. F-88-571Published

1Opinion of the Court

881 P.2d 69 (1994)

Karl Allen FONTENOT, Appellant,

v.

The STATE of Oklahoma, Appellee.

No. F-88-571.

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma.

June 8, 1994.

Petition for Rehearing Denied and Mandate Ordered Issued September 30, 1994.

George Butner, Wewoka, trial counsel for appellant.

Cindy G. Brown, Asst. Appellate Indigent Defender, Norman, appellate counsel for appellant.

William Peterson, Dist. Atty., Chris Ross & Linda G. Evans, Asst. Dist. Attys., Ada, trial counsel for appellee.

Susan B. Loving, Atty. Gen., A. Diane Blalock, Asst. Atty. Gen., Oklahoma City, appellate counsel for appellee.

OPINION

CHAPE…

Also in this document: Concurring in part, dissenting in part.

2Cases cited58 opinions

  1. Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  2. Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
  3. Schneckloth v. BustamonteSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  4. Jackson v. DennoSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
  5. Arizona v. FulminanteSupreme Court of the United States · 1991

53 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API