Legal Opinion

Bloom v. O'BRIEN

District Court, D. Minnesota

Decided December 30, 1993No. Civ. 4-93-1202PublishedCited by 18 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BACKGROUND

DOTY, District Judge.

Plaintiffs are professional health care providers practicing in Minnesota. Plaintiff Sheldon Bloom is a pharmacist, plaintiffs Stephen Brzica, Roger Colton and David Nelson are physicians and plaintiff John Norton is a dentist. Defendants are Minnesota state officials being sued in their official capacities. Plaintiffs filed suit seeking a declaratory judgment, pursuant to Rule 57 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, that Minnesota Statutes Section 295.53, subd. 3 is unconstitutional under the First and Fourteenth Amendments of the United States…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Elrod v. BurnsSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Railroad Comm'n of Tex. v. Pullman Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1941
  3. Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  4. Dataphase Systems, Inc. v. C L Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
  5. Moore v. SimsSupreme Court of the United States · 1979

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by18 opinions

  1. Grant Taylor & Richard Scheiber v. Town of Cabot, The Cabot Community Association, Inc., and United Church of Cabot, Inc.Supreme Court of Vermont · 2017
  2. Nelson v. Appleway Chevrolet, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Nelson v. Appleway Chevrolet, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Expressions Hair Design v. SchneidermanDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2013
  5. Sports Design and Development, Inc. v. SchoneboomDistrict Court, N.D. Iowa · 1995

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API