Legal Opinion · Dissent

Ready v. United/Goedecke Services, Inc.

Illinois Supreme Court

Decided March 23, 2009No. 103474Published

1DissentJustice Garman

The plurality concludes that the phrase “defendants sued by the plaintiff’ in section 2 — 1117 of the Code of Civil Procedure (735 ILCS 5/2 — 1117 (West 1998)) is ambiguous. It then construes the phrase as referring to only those defendants who were sued by the plaintiff but did not enter into a good-faith settlement agreement prior to the entry of judgment. 232 Ill. 2d at 382.1 believe that the phrase “defendants sued by the plaintiff” unambiguously refers to those individuals or entities against whom the plaintiff filed suit. I, therefore, dissent.

PLAIN MEANING

The plurality begins its…

2Cases cited23 opinions

  1. Best v. Taylor MacHine WorksIllinois Supreme Court · 1997
  2. Dole Food Co. v. PatricksonSupreme Court of the United States · 2003
  3. Michigan Avenue National Bank v. County of CookIllinois Supreme Court · 2000
  4. Wakulich v. MrazIllinois Supreme Court · 2003
  5. Wade v. City of North Chicago Police Pension BoardIllinois Supreme Court · 2007

18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API