Legal Opinion

United States v. Doe

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided August 4, 2017No. 17-604PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MORITZ, Circuit Judge.

Plea agreements are “an essential component of the administration of justice.” Santobello v. New York, 404 U.S. 257, 260, 92 S.Ct. 495, 30 L.Ed.2d 427 (1971). But there’s nothing “just[j,” id., about requiring defendants to fulfill their obligations under such agreements unless the government must do the same. Here, the plea agreement obligated the government to exercise its discretion in determining whether to file a substantial-assistance motion. Yet according to the defendant, *1297the government failed to exercise that discretion in good faith and thereby breached the…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Santobello v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. Wayte v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. Wade v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  4. United States v. HahnCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
  5. United States v. MeyersCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2000

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. United States v. GainesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
  2. United States v. E.F.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019
  3. E.M.M. v. Douglas County, ColoradoCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2021
  4. Gabourel v. United StatesDistrict Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2022
  5. In re: Sealed OpinionCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2019

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API