Davis v. Homestead Borough
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
Appeal, No. 140, April T., 1911, by plaintiff, from judgment of C. P. No. 2, Allegheny Co., Jan. T., 1911, No. 311, for defendant in case of T. L. Davis v. Homestead Borough. Case stated to determine plaintiff’s right to certain fees and costs. Before Frazer, P. J. The opinion of the Superior Court states the case. Error assigned was in entering judgment for defendant on case stated.
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion by
Orlady, J.,
By the case stated it appears that the plaintiff was elected burgess of the borough of Homestead, in Alie*446gheny county, in February, 1909, for a term of three years, and was inducted into office on or about March 1, 1909, from which date he held and still holds the office of burgess.
Under the provisions of the act of assembly in force at the time he became burgess, he was entitled to certain fees and costs in the exercise of his jurisdiction and authority in the enforcement of borough ordinances, as well as in the collection of fines and penalties imposed under the same.…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Richie v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1909
- Baldwin v. City of PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1881
- County of Crawford v. NashSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1882
- Klingler v. BickelSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1887
- McCormick v. Fayette Co.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1892
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Buckwalter v. Borough of PhoenixvilleSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2009
- Taylor v. PhiladelphiaSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1918
- Buckwalter v. Borough of PhoenixvilleCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2008
- Commonwealth v. Corrigan, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Bucks County1976
- City of Philadelphia v. Houlihan, Pennsylvania Court of Common Pleas, Philadelphia County1940
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.