Legal Opinion

Turbodyne Corp. v. Heard

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided September 5, 1985No. C14-85-252-CVPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ROBERTSON, Justice.

Relators, Turbodyne Corporation, et al., seek a writ of mandamus (1) compelling the Honorable Wyatt H. Heard, Judge of the 190th Judicial District Court of Harris County, to rescind his order of January 16, 1985, denying relators’ motion for production of certain documents, and (2) commanding him to examine those documents in camera to determine whether they are discoverable. The principal issue before this court is whether Texas Rule of Civil Procedure 166b(3)(d) should be read literally. We opt for a literal reading and decline to issue the writ.

Relators are…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Brownlee v. BrownleeTexas Supreme Court · 1984
  2. Allen v. HumphreysTexas Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Barker v. DunhamTexas Supreme Court · 1977
  4. Giffin v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1985
  5. Lindsey v. O'NEILLTexas Supreme Court · 1985

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Turbodyne Corp. v. HeardTexas Supreme Court · 1986
  2. Service Lloyds Insurance Co. v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986
  3. Victoria Lloyds Insurance Co. v. Gayle, Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1986
  4. Weisel Enterprises, Inc. v. Curry, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1986
  5. Essex Crane Rental Corp. v. KitzmanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API