Legal Opinion
The Norwich Savings Society v. Hunter, No. 108808 (Apr. 2, 1996)
Connecticut Superior Court
Decided April 2, 1996No. 108808UnpublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
[EDITOR'S NOTE: This case is unpublished as indicated by the issuing court.]ORDER The foregoing Motion for Summary Judgment having been duly heard and reviewed, it is hereby ORDERED that said Motion be: GRANTED.
Memorandum of Decision Re: Motion for Summary Judgment #119.
Events occurring post-default cannot form the bases of an affirmative defense to foreclose because they do not render the note itself invalid or unenforceable. This court adopts the reasoning and opinions expressed by F. Owen Egan v. U.S.Magistrate in the U.S. District Court of Connecticut, Civil Action No. 3:95CV0491, First…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Shirley Small v. Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1989
- prod.liab.rep.(cch)p 12,749 Thomas Latimer, Et Ux, Carol Latimer v. Smithkline & French Laboratories, a Division of Smithkline Beckman Corp.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1990
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Monument Realty v. Youmatz, No. Cv 0071092 (Feb. 18, 1997)Connecticut Superior Court · 1997