Legal Opinion

Staats v. Commissioner, Social Security Administration

District Court, D. Colorado

Decided May 3, 2024No. 1:23-cv-02234Unknown

1Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLORADO Civil Action No. 23-cv-002234-NRN K.S., Plaintiff, v. MARTIN O’MALLEY, Commissioner of Social Security,1 Defendant. OPINION AND ORDER N. Reid Neureiter United States Magistrate Judge The government determined that Plaintiff K.S.2 was not disabled for purposes of the Social Security Act. AR3 30. Plaintiff has asked this Court to review that decision. The Court has jurisdiction under 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and both parties have agreed to have this case decided by a United States Magistrate Judge under 28 U.S.C. § 636(c). Dkt. #8. 1…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Glen W. WILLIAMS, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Otis R. BOWEN, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services, Defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1988
  2. Lax v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2007
  3. Keyes-Zachary v. AstrueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2012
  4. Langley v. BarnhartCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2004
  5. Linda S. Thompson v. Louis W. Sullivan, M.D., Secretary of Health & Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API