Legal Opinion

Howard v. American Oil Company

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided September 2, 1966No. File 10224PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

BIEGELMEIER, Judge.

Plaintiff, a lessee of a service station, brought this action for damages against defendant lessor for claimed interference with his business relations and for breach of the covenant of quiet enjoyment implied in the lease. Defendant appeals from a judgment for plaintiff for actual and punitive damages. We reverse.

Defendant company had commenced an action for possession of the service station in September 1963 which resulted in a verdict and judgment for the present plaintiff who remained in possession and was in possession of the property at the time of trial of this…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Kuiken v. GarrettSupreme Court of Iowa · 1952
  2. Tuttle v. BuckSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1909
  3. Dunshee v. Standard Oil Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1911
  4. Eagle Glass & Manufacturing Co. v. RoweSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
  5. Black v. KnightCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Howard v. American Oil CompanySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1966

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API