Legal Opinion

Torre v. Chesnut

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided February 10, 1931No. 13066PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the Court was delivered by

Mr. Justice Cothran.

This is an appeal from a decree of his Honor, Judge Grim-ball, construing a certain feature of the will of Mrs. Alexina Chesnut Holmes, affecting adversely the claims of the appellants Edna E. Miller, James G. Chesnut, and William Taylor Chesnut, Jr, children of William T. Chesnut, Sr, a brother of the testatrix, who predeceased her.

The situation is quite complicated, but may be grasped by careful attention to the following undisputed facts:

Mrs. Alexina Holmes died on March 8, 1929, leaving a very large estate, over $200,000, and a…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Booth v. Baptist Church of Christ of PoughkeepsieNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
  2. Kerr v. . DoughertyNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  3. Beekman v. . BonsorNew York Court of Appeals · 1861
  4. Matter of HoffmanNew York Court of Appeals · 1911
  5. In Re the Accounting of KingNew York Court of Appeals · 1910

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. RIKARD v. MillerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1957
  2. First Nat'l Bank of Holly Hill v. BennettSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1945
  3. Davis v. DavisSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1946

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API