Legal Opinion
Federico v. Frick
California Court of Appeal
Decided January 26, 1970No. Civ. 34084PublishedCited by 20 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
COBEY, J.
Jerome H. Frick appeals from a judgment for $12,627 confirming an arbitration award against him. The appeal lies. (Code Civ. Proc., § 1294, subd. (d).) The basis of the appeal, broadly stated, is that there was no agreement to arbitrate and the arbitration was not an impartial one. We find no merit in the appeal.
The Facts Generally
On August 23, 1967, Armando Federico was hired for a period of one year as a pianist at the Mikado, a restaurant and cocktail lounge owned and operated by Frick. This employment was made under a standard printed contract of Local 47 of the American…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Gray v. Zurich Insurance Co.California Supreme Court · 1966
- Lesser Towers, Inc. v. Roscoe-Ajax Construction Co.California Court of Appeal · 1969
- Gear v. WebsterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Canadian Indemnity Co. v. OhmCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1969
- Horn v. GurewitzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Graham v. Scissor-Tail, Inc.California Supreme Court · 1981
- Madden v. Kaiser Foundation HospitalsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- Wheeler v. St. Joseph HospitalCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1976
- Frame v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1971
- Ware v. Merrill Lynch, Pierce, Fenner & Smith, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1972
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.