Legal Opinion

Russell v. Beutelschies

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided February 18, 1936No. 26538Published

1Per curiam

The parties appear here as they appeared in the trial court and will be referred to in this opinion as plaintiffs and defendants.

On the 20th day of August, 1934, plaintiffs filed their petition alleging that they are operators of a mine; that the defendants contracted with the Port Smith & Western Railway Company to switch' coal from the mine of plaintiffs on a spur to the tracks of the railway company; that the defendants were paid $5 per car for this service by the railway company; that during a period from and including the 1st day of August, 1929, to and including the 31st day of March,…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Southern Pacific Co. v. Darnell-Taenzer Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
  2. New York Central & Hudson River Railroad v. York & Whitney Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1921
  3. Adams v. MillsSupreme Court of the United States · 1932
  4. Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Sloss-sheffield Steel & Iron Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. Brookshire v. BurkhartSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1929

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API