Legal Opinion

Ott v. City of Milwaukee

District Court, E.D. Wisconsin

Decided February 9, 2011No. 09-C-870PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DECISION AND ORDER

RUDOLPH T. RANDA, District Judge.

This civil rights action filed by Plaintiff, Chaunte Ott (“Ott”) arises from Ott’s wrongful conviction for the 1995 murder of Jessica Payne. Pursuant to Rule 45 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Ott served subpoenas upon two non-parties, the Wisconsin State Crime Laboratory and the Wisconsin Department of Corrections (collectively, the “State agencies”). The State agencies filed an amended motion to quash subpoenas. Subsequently, upon review of the parties’ briefs, the Court requested that they submit supplemental briefs on one issue…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Vermont Agency of Natural Resources v. United States Ex Rel. StevensSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Gustafson v. Alloyd Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1995
  3. Marek v. ChesnySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  4. Nardone v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
  5. Diane Colby, on Her Own Behalf and That of All Other Persons Similarly Situated v. J.C. Penney Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1987

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ashoor v. Page Transportation, Inc.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2025
  2. Catherine TrinhUnited States Bankruptcy Court, C.D. California · 2022
  3. Doe v. Purdue UniversityDistrict Court, N.D. Indiana · 2021
  4. Dou v. Carillon Tower/Chicago LPDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API