Legal Opinion

Texas & Pacific Railway Co. v. Reed

Texas Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1895No. 318PublishedCited by 56 opinions

Error to Court of Civil Appeals for Fifth District, in an appeal from Dallas County. The opinion gives a sufficient statement.

1Opinion of the Court

GAINES, Chief Justice.

—The defendant in error, while employed as a uight switchman on plaintiff in error’s yard, at Toy ah, a station on its line, was injured, and brought this action against the company to recover damages therefor. It was alleged, that the accident was caused by the negligence of one Ed. Moore, the night yardmaster or foreman of the defendant at the station mentioned, and that he had superintendence over the plaintiff, with the power to employ and discharge the servants subject to his control. Upon the occasion in question, they were switching cars for the purpose of making…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Missouri Pacific Railway Co. v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1889
  2. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1890

3Cited by56 opinions

  1. Newspapers, Inc. v. LoveTexas Supreme Court · 1964
  2. McCray v. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1896
  3. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. HillTexas Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Texas & P. Ry. Co. v. ShortCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1933
  5. Houston & T. C. R. Co. v. GrayCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1911

51 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API