Westergaard v. United States
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
Hatfield, Judge,
delivered tbe opinion of tbe court:
This is an appeal from the judgment of the United States Customs Court.
Merchandise, consisting of fish balls, fish cakes, meat balls, and meat cakes, imported in cans, was assessed for duty by the collector at the port of New York at 35 per centum ad valorem under the provision for “soups, pastes, balls, puddings, hash, and all similar forms, composed of vegetables, or of vegetables and meat or fish, or both, not specially provided for,” contained in paragraph 773 of the Tariff Act of 1922.
*300The paragraph reads as follows:
Par. 773. Vegetables,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Stein v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1915
- United States v. KawaharaCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1927
- United States v. RichardsonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1925
- Vitelli v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1913
3Cited by3 opinions
- Orlando Food Corp. v. StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Alcan Aluminum Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- Alcan Aluminum Corporation v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999