Legal Opinion

Denning v. Lee

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 7, 1978No. 7711SC331PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

ERWIN, Judge.

The plaintiff’s sole assignment of error is that the trial court erred in allowing the defendant’s motion for a directed verdict and in signing and entering its judgment. We agree. The grounds for the motion were that plaintiff had failed to show malice and lack of probable cause and that the warrant was defective. It is well settled that on a motion by a defendant for a directed verdict under Rule 50(a), the court must consider the evidence in the light most favorable to the plaintiff and may grant such motion only if, as a matter of law, the evidence is insufficient to justify…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Kelly v. International Harvester CompanySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  2. Dickerson v. . Refining Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1931
  3. Cook v. LanierSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  4. Mooney v. . MullSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  5. Moser v. FulkSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jones v. City of GreensboroCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 1981

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API