Legal Opinion

Howard Iron Works v. Buffalo Elevating Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided May 9, 1906PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Appeal from Erie Comity Court. Actions by the Howard Iron Works against the Buffalo Elevating Company. Prom a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals.

Read the full summary

Appeal from Erie Comity Court. Actions by the Howard Iron Works against the Buffalo Elevating Company. Prom a judgment for plaintiff, defendant appeals. The opinion of Referee Charles J. Bissell is ak follows: Both of these actions were commenced in the County Court of Erie county by the plaintiff, a manufacturing corporation doing business at Buffalo, N. A'., against the defendant, a corporation engaged in the elevating of grain and the owner of a large elevator, known as the “Dakota Elevator,” situate in the Buffalo harbor. In the year 1900 the defendant was engaged in repairing extensively…

1Per curiam

Judgment affirmed, with costs, on opinion of Charles J. Bissell, referee.

WILLIAMS, J., not voting.

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co. v. SmithDistrict Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1948
  2. Miller v. WintersNew York Supreme Court · 1913
  3. Young v. Great Atlantic & Pacific Tea Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1936
  4. Leiter v. Innis, Speiden & Co.Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1912
  5. Ridge Seneca Plaza, LLC v. BP Products North AmericaDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API