Guillen v. Pierce County
Court of Appeals of Washington
1Dissent
¶32 (dissenting) — The plaintiffs brought a road-liability case against Pierce County. The County responded by denying a great deal of obviously relevant discovery pursuant to its erroneous reading of a federal funding statute and by asserting that the claim-filing statute had not been met. On the discovery matter, two different trial courts (Judge John A. McCarthy in the 1998 personal injury case and Judge Frederick B. Hayes in a related case based on the public disclosure act, chapter 42.17 RCW) rejected the County’s position. We granted discretionary review and rejected the County’s…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Spokane County v. Specialty Auto and Truck Painting, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
- Spokane County v. Specialty Auto & Truck Painting, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
- Spokane County v. Specialty Auto & Truck Painting, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2003
- COWLITZ STUD CO. v. ClevengerWashington Supreme Court · 2006