Legal Opinion · Dissent

Guillen v. Pierce County

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 27, 2005No. 31258-1-IIPublished

1Dissent

¶32 (dissenting) — The plaintiffs brought a road-liability case against Pierce County. The County responded by denying a great deal of obviously relevant discovery pursuant to its erroneous reading of a federal funding statute and by asserting that the claim-filing statute had not been met. On the discovery matter, two different trial courts (Judge John A. McCarthy in the 1998 personal injury case and Judge Frederick B. Hayes in a related case based on the public disclosure act, chapter 42.17 RCW) rejected the County’s position. We granted discretionary review and rejected the County’s…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Spokane County v. Specialty Auto and Truck Painting, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
  2. Spokane County v. Specialty Auto & Truck Painting, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
  3. Spokane County v. Specialty Auto & Truck Painting, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  4. COWLITZ STUD CO. v. ClevengerWashington Supreme Court · 2006

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API