Legal Opinion
Spokane County v. Specialty Auto & Truck Painting, Inc.
Washington Supreme Court
Decided December 23, 2004No. Nos. 74539-1; 75328-8PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
¶1 This consolidated case involves interpretation of Superior Court Civil Rule (CR) 41(a)(4), the “two dismissal” rule. We accepted review of both matters to resolve an apparent conflict between divisions of the Court of Appeals. We affirm the result of both the Court of Appeals decision in Spokane County v. Specialty Auto & Truck Painting, Inc., 119 Wn. App. 391, 79 P.3d 448 (2003) and the trial court decision in Faust v. Bellingham Lodge No. 493, Loyal Order of Moose, Inc., No. 03-2-00859-8 (Whatcom County Super. Ct. Aug. 1, 2003).
Johnson, J.
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
Spokane County v.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Burnet v. Spokane AmbulanceWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- Wagner v. WagnerWashington Supreme Court · 1980
- Sheldon v. FettigWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- Sheldon v. FettigWashington Supreme Court · 1996
- Mead School District No. 354 v. Mead Education Ass'nWashington Supreme Court · 1975
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- City of Seattle v. HolifieldWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- City of Seattle v. HolifieldWashington Supreme Court · 2010
- Spokane County v. Specialty Auto and Truck Painting, Inc.Washington Supreme Court · 2004
- State v. KoneCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2011
- Feature Realty, Inc. v. Kirkpatrick & Lockhart Preston Gates Ellis, LLPWashington Supreme Court · 2007
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.