Hildenbrand v. National Butter Co.
District Court, D. Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
JOYCE, District Judge.
Defendants herein move to dismiss this action brought by nine certificated common carriers to enjoin defendants from transporting property in interstate commerce by motor vehicle for compensation unless and until such time as they have obtained from the Interstate Commerce Commission a permit and certificate of convenience and ■necessity authorizing them to engage in such operations and business. Defendants’ motion to dismiss is based upon the grounds that the court is without .jurisdiction over the subject matter, and that the plaintiffs .are not the proper parties to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Great Northern Railway Co. v. Merchants Elevator Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1922
- Civil Aeronautics Board v. Modern Air Transport, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1950
- Interstate Commerce Commission v. F & F Truck Leasing Co.District Court, D. Minnesota · 1948
- Trans-Pacific Airlines, Ltd. v. Hawaiian Airlines, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1949
- Akers Motor Lines, Inc. v. Malone Freight Lines, Inc.District Court, N.D. Alabama · 1950
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Briggs Transfer Co. v. National Butter Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1952